{
  "status": "Illustrative acceptance plan, not an executable test suite or observed production result",
  "topic": "Custom fitness app vendor RFP",
  "date": "2026-11-04",
  "sourceArticle": "https://aptixlabs.com/insights/fitness-app-development-rfp",
  "setup": [
    "Use synthetic accounts and records",
    "Record the environment and implementation version",
    "Agree the expected product contract before testing"
  ],
  "reviewSequence": [
    "Define the actual coach and client operating model",
    "Request evidence for priority lifecycle scenarios",
    "Separate existing features custom scope and unresolved dependencies"
  ],
  "cases": [
    {
      "id": "1",
      "condition": "Vendor claims wearable support",
      "expectedBehavior": "Verify the required devices metrics and access conditions",
      "observedBehavior": null,
      "status": "not_run"
    },
    {
      "id": "2",
      "condition": "A role changes",
      "expectedBehavior": "Demonstrate current permission behavior",
      "observedBehavior": null,
      "status": "not_run"
    },
    {
      "id": "3",
      "condition": "A feature is planned",
      "expectedBehavior": "It is not scored as currently delivered",
      "observedBehavior": null,
      "status": "not_run"
    }
  ],
  "tradeoff": "An excessively broad RFP can invite equally broad proposals. Prioritize must-have workflows and state which decisions can be deferred to a pilot or discovery phase."
}