{
  "status": "Illustrative acceptance plan, not an executable test suite or observed production result",
  "topic": "Healthtech pilot success criteria",
  "date": "2026-11-04",
  "sourceArticle": "https://aptixlabs.com/insights/healthtech-pilot-evaluation-metrics",
  "setup": [
    "Use synthetic accounts and records",
    "Record the environment and implementation version",
    "Agree the expected product contract before testing"
  ],
  "reviewSequence": [
    "Separate feasibility adoption and clinical claims",
    "Define metrics evidence and stop conditions in advance",
    "Assign participant support and review responsibilities"
  ],
  "cases": [
    {
      "id": "1",
      "condition": "Data sync works",
      "expectedBehavior": "Report feasibility rather than health efficacy",
      "observedBehavior": null,
      "status": "not_run"
    },
    {
      "id": "2",
      "condition": "A participant has a support issue",
      "expectedBehavior": "The owner and response path are known",
      "observedBehavior": null,
      "status": "not_run"
    },
    {
      "id": "3",
      "condition": "The sample is small",
      "expectedBehavior": "Results retain their stated scope and limitations",
      "observedBehavior": null,
      "status": "not_run"
    }
  ],
  "tradeoff": "A narrowly scoped pilot may feel less impressive in marketing, but it produces more interpretable evidence and a clearer decision about the next investment."
}