{
  "status": "Illustrative acceptance plan, not an executable test suite or observed production result",
  "topic": "App subscription entitlement reconciliation",
  "date": "2026-11-04",
  "sourceArticle": "https://aptixlabs.com/insights/mobile-subscription-entitlement-sync",
  "setup": [
    "Use synthetic accounts and records",
    "Record the environment and implementation version",
    "Agree the expected product contract before testing"
  ],
  "reviewSequence": [
    "Define entitlement states and their authoritative evidence",
    "Separate store identity from application account linking",
    "Reconcile purchase restore refund and notification paths"
  ],
  "cases": [
    {
      "id": "1",
      "condition": "A store notification is duplicated",
      "expectedBehavior": "Access is not granted twice or extended incorrectly",
      "observedBehavior": null,
      "status": "not_run"
    },
    {
      "id": "2",
      "condition": "Purchase is pending",
      "expectedBehavior": "The UI does not claim confirmed access",
      "observedBehavior": null,
      "status": "not_run"
    },
    {
      "id": "3",
      "condition": "User restores on another device",
      "expectedBehavior": "The correct account receives verified entitlement",
      "observedBehavior": null,
      "status": "not_run"
    }
  ],
  "tradeoff": "A single boolean premium flag is convenient but loses the state needed to explain pending purchases and recovery. A small explicit state model is easier to support as the product grows."
}